TheSony A7 mark III and Fujifilm X-H1 are priced similarly at approximately $1900/$2000 and are, at the time of writing, two of the most interesting offerings from their respective brands. (similar to the a6300/a6500) that employs a thinner copper wiring rather than aluminium. It allows the sensor to gather light more efficiently, read
Comparison Max. image resolution 6000 x 4000 6000 x 4000 Sensor Sensor size x mm x mm Sensor resolution 6058 x 4012 6045 x 4003 Diagonal mm mm Sensor size comparison Sensor size is generally a good indicator of the quality of the camera. Sensors can vary greatly in size. As a general rule, the bigger the sensor, the better the image quality. Bigger sensors are more effective because they have more surface area to capture light. An important factor when comparing digital cameras is also camera generation. Generally, newer sensors will outperform the older. Learn more about sensor sizes » Actual sensor size Note Actual size is set to screen → change » vs 1 1 ratio Fujifilm X-H1 Sony Alpha a6500 Surface area Difference 0 mm² 0% X-H1 and Alpha a6500 sensors are the same size. Note You are comparing cameras of different generations. There is a 2 year gap between Fujifilm X-H1 2018 and Sony Alpha a6500 2016. All things being equal, newer sensor generations generally outperform the older. Pixel pitch tells you the distance from the center of one pixel photosite to the center of the next. It tells you how close the pixels are to each other. The bigger the pixel pitch, the further apart they are and the bigger each pixel is. Bigger pixels tend to have better signal to noise ratio and greater dynamic range. Difference µm Pixel pitch of Alpha a6500 is approx. higher than pixel pitch of X-H1. Pixel area µm² µm² Pixel or photosite area affects how much light per pixel can be gathered. The larger it is the more light can be collected by a single pixel. Larger pixels have the potential to collect more photons, resulting in greater dynamic range, while smaller pixels provide higher resolutions more detail for a given sensor size. Relative pixel sizes Pixel area difference µm² A pixel on Sony Alpha a6500 sensor is approx. bigger than a pixel on Fujifilm X-H1. Pixel density tells you how many million pixels fit or would fit in one square cm of the sensor. Higher pixel density means smaller pixels and lower pixel density means larger pixels. Difference µm Fujifilm X-H1 has approx. higher pixel density than Sony Alpha a6500. To learn about the accuracy of these numbers, click here. Specs Effective megapixels ISO sensitivity Auto, 200-12800 extends to 100-51200 Auto, 100-25600 expandable to 51200 Focal length 35mm equiv. Aperture priority Yes Yes Max. aperture 35mm equiv. n/a n/a Metering Multi, Center-weighted, Spot Multi, Center-weighted, Spot Exposure compensation ±5 EV in 1/3 EV steps ±5 EV in 1/3 EV, 1/2 EV steps Min. shutter speed 30 sec 30 sec Max. shutter speed 1/8000 sec 1/4000 sec Viewfinder Electronic Electronic White balance presets 7 8 Screen resolution 1,040,000 dots 921,600 dots Max. video resolution 4096x2160 24p 3840x2160 30p/25p/24p Storage types SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC/MS PRO Duo USB USB 5 GBit/sec USB 480 Mbit/sec Battery NP-W126S lithium-ion battery NP-FW50 Lithium-ion battery Dimensions x x mm 120 x x mm Choose cameras to compare Popular comparisons Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D750 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Fujifilm X-T3 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Sony Alpha A7 III Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D500 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Canon EOS 5D Mark III Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Canon EOS R Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Fujifilm X-T2 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D810 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D7200 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Fujifilm X-T1 Diagonal Diagonal is calculated by the use of Pythagorean theorem where w = sensor width and h = sensor height Fujifilm X-H1 diagonal w = mm h = mm Diagonal = √ + = mm Sony Alpha a6500 diagonal w = mm h = mm Diagonal = √ + = mm Surface area Surface area is calculated by multiplying the width and the height of a sensor. X-H1 sensor area Width = mm Height = mm Surface area = × = mm² Alpha a6500 sensor area Width = mm Height = mm Surface area = × = mm² Pixel pitch Pixel pitch is the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the next measured in micrometers µm. It can be calculated with the following formula Pixel pitch = sensor width in mm × 1000 sensor resolution width in pixels X-H1 pixel pitch Sensor width = mm Sensor resolution width = 6058 pixels Pixel pitch = × 1000 = µm 6058 Alpha a6500 pixel pitch Sensor width = mm Sensor resolution width = 6045 pixels Pixel pitch = × 1000 = µm 6045 Pixel area The area of one pixel can be calculated by simply squaring the pixel pitch Pixel area = pixel pitch² You could also divide sensor surface area with effective megapixels Pixel area = sensor surface area in mm² effective megapixels X-H1 pixel area Pixel pitch = µm Pixel area = = µm² Alpha a6500 pixel area Pixel pitch = µm Pixel area = = µm² Pixel density Pixel density can be calculated with the following formula Pixel density = sensor resolution width in pixels ² / 1000000 sensor width in cm One could also use this formula Pixel density = effective megapixels × 1000000 / 10000 sensor surface area in mm² X-H1 pixel density Sensor resolution width = 6058 pixels Sensor width = cm Pixel density = 6058 / / 1000000 = MP/cm² Alpha a6500 pixel density Sensor resolution width = 6045 pixels Sensor width = cm Pixel density = 6045 / / 1000000 = MP/cm² Sensor resolution Sensor resolution is calculated from sensor size and effective megapixels. It's slightly higher than maximum not interpolated image resolution which is usually stated on camera specifications. Sensor resolution is used in pixel pitch, pixel area, and pixel density formula. For sake of simplicity, we're going to calculate it in 3 stages. 1. First we need to find the ratio between horizontal and vertical length by dividing the former with the latter aspect ratio. It's usually 43 or 32, but not always. 2. With the ratio r known we can calculate the X from the formula below, where X is a vertical number of pixels X × r × X = effective megapixels × 1000000 → X = √ effective megapixels × 1000000 r 3. To get sensor resolution we then multiply X with the corresponding ratio Resolution horizontal X × r Resolution vertical X X-H1 sensor resolution Sensor width = mm Sensor height = mm Effective megapixels = r = = X = √ × 1000000 = 4012 Resolution horizontal X × r = 4012 × = 6058 Resolution vertical X = 4012 Sensor resolution = 6058 x 4012 Alpha a6500 sensor resolution Sensor width = mm Sensor height = mm Effective megapixels = r = = X = √ × 1000000 = 4003 Resolution horizontal X × r = 4003 × = 6045 Resolution vertical X = 4003 Sensor resolution = 6045 x 4003 Crop factor Crop factor or focal length multiplier is calculated by dividing the diagonal of 35 mm film mm with the diagonal of the sensor. Crop factor = mm sensor diagonal in mm X-H1 crop factor Sensor diagonal in mm = mm Crop factor = = Alpha a6500 crop factor Sensor diagonal in mm = mm Crop factor = = 35 mm equivalent aperture Equivalent aperture in 135 film terms is calculated by multiplying lens aperture with crop factor focal length multiplier. X-H1 equivalent aperture Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for Fujifilm X-H1, take the aperture of the lens you're using and multiply it with crop factor. Crop factor for Fujifilm X-H1 is Alpha a6500 equivalent aperture Aperture is a lens characteristic, so it's calculated only for fixed lens cameras. If you want to know the equivalent aperture for Sony Alpha a6500, take the aperture of the lens you're using and multiply it with crop factor. Crop factor for Sony Alpha a6500 is More comparisons of Fujifilm X-H1 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D850 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Sony Alpha a6500 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Panasonic Lumix DC-G9 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Sony Alpha a7R III Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Fujifilm X-Pro2 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Fujifilm X-T20 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Nikon D700 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Canon EOS M50 Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Fujifilm X-H1 vs. Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II Enter your screen size diagonal My screen size is inches Actual size is currently adjusted to screen. If your screen phone, tablet, or monitor is not in diagonal, then the actual size of a sensor won't be shown correctly.
OkI'm trying to decide if I want to buy the Fuji X-T3, BMPCC 4K, Sony A6500-7000, or GH5. I was leaning towards Fuji X-T3. I'm a hybrid shooter so I need the best of both worlds of video and photos. This is my first time looking at the Fuji XH1. I didn't know this was also a APC-S camera as well.
1 Doing some high ISO test among my two current favorite IBIS bodies Disclaimer I am with no intention not since I registered with this site in 2016, not to mention being a lurker since 2014 to persuade/convert any body in this FUJI wonderful & friendly forum to buy any thing or switch brand. This is a Fuji forum, I love Fuji but that doesn't mean I only shoot Fuji. I will choose and spend money toward gears that fit/satisfy my hobby. That's including my all time favorite Canon 20D & 7D-II, Nikon D610, etc. I have never bought so many Fuji bodies/lenses in my life. So I've always considered myself a Fuji fan. Glad to get this out of the way. The following unscientific tests was for me to see what limit I can push these two bodies in extreme low light condition With that, how far I can push those high ISO for usable images in this coming trip to Asia All shots are handheld, candle light really dim, ISO shown on pix below, f/ on all shots, 1/20s - 1/125s, SOOC 1st image is from X-H1 ranging ISO 6400, 12800, 25600 with 16-55 2nd image is from a6500 with the same ISO range with Canon 85mm 3rd image is from a6500 with NR turned on with Canon 85mm Overall, I'm quite happy with both of my X-H1, and a6500 Not enough to distinguish except the group with NR pretty neat result All images are definitely usable at ISO 6400 Thanks for looking! Last edited Jun 15, 2019 2 Doing some high ISO test among my two current favorite IBIS bodies Disclaimer I am with no intention not since I registered with this site in 2016, not to mention being a lurker since 2014 to persuade/convert any body in this FUJI wonderful & friendly forum to buy any thing or switch brand. This is a Fuji forum, I love Fuji but that doesn't mean I only shoot Fuji. I will choose and spend money toward gears that fit/satisfy my hobby. That's including my all time favorite Canon 20D & 7D-II, Nikon D610, etc. I have never bought so many Fuji bodies/lenses in my life. So I've always considered myself a Fuji fan. Glad to get this out of the way. The following unscientific tests was for me to see what limit I can push these two bodies in extreme low light condition With that, how far I can push those high ISO for usable images in this coming trip to Asia All shots are handheld, candle light really dim, ISO shown on pix below, f/ on all shots, 1/20s - 1/125s, SOOC 1st image is from X-H1 ranging ISO 6400, 12800, 25600 with 16-55 2nd image is from a6500 with the same ISO range with Canon 85mm 3rd image is from a6500 with NR turned on with Canon 85mm Overall, I'm quite happy with both of my X-H1, and a6500 Not enough to distinguish except the group with NR pretty neat result All images are definitely usable at ISO 6400 Thanks for looking! Thanks for the research! 3 Pretty impressive NR on the Sony really... How much crop? Thanks for sharing LionSpeed 4 Pretty impressive NR on the Sony really... How much crop? Thanks for sharing LionSpeed Thanks so much Chuck and Shadowside Crop? I'm very poor in math, so bare with me here First I scale the original down from 6000px to 3000px in photoshop then copy and paste those images in 1600px X 1607px new document to post in here at 100% 5 To my eyes, the Sony with NR looks the best. 6 Plastic doesn't have the same texture and detail as human skin, so I would be cautious thinking this test as good as it is would translate into the same results with a human subject. That's been one of the hardest tests for NR to really impress with, not making skin waxy and flat looking. This subject is already waxy, so no real harm done. But, what this test does reveal well is how the noise has been handled in the mid-tone areas and in retaining a lot of the details in the beads and around the eyes. All in, very impressive how far along this technology has come. 7 Plastic doesn't have the same texture and detail as human skin, so I would be cautious thinking this test as good as it is would translate into the same results with a human subject. That's been one of the hardest tests for NR to really impress with, not making skin waxy and flat looking. +1 I'd add, it's not fair to use a zoom against primes. In comparison, XF 16-55/ with a total of 17 elements in 12 groups, is very noisy in low light. Too much detail is lost. Just OK in the good light 8 +1 I'd add, it's not fair to use a zoom against primes. In comparison, XF 16-55/ with a total of 17 elements in 12 groups, is very noisy in low light. Too much detail is lost. Just OK in the good light I totally agree with zoom is no match against prime And without your comment, I would not have thought of taking the Fuji Kit 18-55 f/ $600 when buy separate vs Sony 16-50 Kit lens $150 f/ May be just a tat unfair, but hey they're both "Kit" lens Since the model was only 6" tall, I would need to use max zoom for each lens And Sony can't go any bigger than I had to shoot Fuji at the same aperture All handheld, just to be sure I nailed the focus, I took 5 shots each cam and chose the sharpest Again in extreme low light 1/20s, f/ ISO 6400, SOOC 9 What annoys me the most is how the Fuji pictures are always darker at the same iso because apparently Fuji uses a different scale. Last edited Jun 15, 2019 10 Huge diff in sharpness 11 I totally agree with zoom is no match against prime And without your comment, I would not have thought of taking the Fuji Kit 18-55 f/ $600 when buy separate vs Sony 16-50 Kit lens $150 f/ May be just a tat unfair, but hey they're both "Kit" lens Since the model was only 6" tall, I would need to use max zoom for each lens And Sony can't go any bigger than I had to shoot Fuji at the same aperture All handheld, just to be sure I nailed the focus, I took 5 shots each cam and chose the sharpest Again in extreme low light 1/20s, f/ ISO 6400, SOOC Because, ppl call them kit lens, does not mean, they are equal. What you can get for $150? Waste of money. 12 The Sony lens looks pretty sharp to me. Both cameras performed really good here IMO. 13 Are you saying those last two doll shots were both hand held at 1/20th sec post 8? At that shutter speed I would expect the possibility of motion blur would be rather significant, with or without stabilization. How can any discussion of sharpness be valid if hand held at 1/20th sec? Your results may suggest that image stabilizaion of the a6500 is more effective than Fuji's OIS, but to compare sharpness you need a tripod. 14 Are you saying those last two doll shots were both hand held at 1/20th sec post 8? At that shutter speed I would expect the possibility of motion blur would be rather significant, with or without stabilization. How can any discussion of sharpness be valid if hand held at 1/20th sec? Your results may suggest that image stabilizaion of the a6500 is more effective than Fuji's OIS, but to compare sharpness you need a tripod. Yes, all hand held 1/20 is plenty. I normally shoot at 1/8 with sharp sharp images. Any below than 1/8 might not be as sharp X-H1's IBIS isn't far from a6500's Fuji 18-55mm OIS is stops. With X-H1 IBIS, cooperative control total of stops So shooting 1/8 is sort of normal for me 15 Just for curious, I went and take a shot at 1/6s yes still hand held Still holding its sharpness, crazy little camera Last edited Jun 16, 2019 16 That's really impressive for hand held but I do see some softness in that image of I pixel peep. 17 Yes, all hand held 1/20 is plenty. I normally shoot at 1/8 with sharp sharp images. Any below than 1/8 might not be as sharp X-H1's IBIS isn't far from a6500's Fuji 18-55mm OIS is stops. With X-H1 IBIS, cooperative control total of stops So shooting 1/8 is sort of normal for me Amazing! Hoping Fuji will eventually figure out a way to offer IBIS in some of their smaller, more affordable bodies. 18 Aww, man, Alisa? Pfft. You gotta get some Julia or Zafina in there, stat. Good on you for doing a second test without the Sony multi-frame NR. It does go to show how much work the software is doing. But hey, you're getting the results you want and that's what matters. Still, now use that feature on a tripod and you'll really blow peoples' minds. What annoys me the most is how the Fuji pictures are always darker at the same iso because apparently Fuji uses a different scale. It's not so much a different "scale" as it is that camera ISOs are poorly-defined in the first place and to account for manufacturing tolerances any manufacturer is allowed to label pretty much any ISO whatever they like, which they all abuse; Fuji just abuse that chance even more than the others. Except the Canon 80D, which is an almost exact copy, ISO-wise, of Fuji. Of course in this example the lens is different, too, and there could be different transmission even at the same aperture, further exaggerating the difference in exposure. But all that only matters when you are comparing two different cameras directly head-to-head like this and you're trying to match your results by copying the numbers. For 'real' shooting you can just use your eyes, forget the numbers even exist at all, and just shift stuff up or down until it looks right. 'S what I do most of the time, to be honest. Sticking the camera on auto ISO and then just using exposure compensation to get the brightness looking right on the screen, ignoring what ISO number the camera claims to be using, is a big headache-saver. I never mix systems in a shoot so Fuji's massive over-valuing of their ISO ratings doesn't actually cause a problem.
FujiFilmJX300 vs Sony A6500 Key Specs. FujiFilm JX300 (Full Review) 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor; 2.7" Fixed Display; ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200) 1280 x 720 video; 28-140mm (F) lens; 130g - 94 x 56 x 24mm; Introduced January 2011; Also Known as FinePix JX305; Sony A6500 (Full Review)
Fujifilm X-H1 Sony Alpha ILCE-A6500 Sensor and Camera Features Brand Fujifilm Sony Megapixels Sensor Type CMOS CMOS Sensor Format APS-C APS-C SLR Type Mirrorless Mirrorless Crop Factor AA Filter Not needed Fixed Image Resolution 6000 x 4000 MP, 32 6000 x 4000 MP, 32 Body Image Stabilization Yes Yes Native ISO Min 200 - Max 12800 Min 100 - Max 25600 Full ISO Settings AUTO with selectable limit, ISO 200-12800, Extended output sensitivity equivalent to ISO 100, 125, 160, 25600 and 51200 Auto, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200, 6400, 12800, 25600, expandable to 51200 Startup Time seconds AF System and Shooting Auto Focus Type Hybrid Phase/Contrast Detect AF 325 points total, 169 phase-detect points; Single point AF EVF / LCD 13x7 / 25x13 changeable size of AF frame among 5 types, Zone AF 3x3 / 5x5 / 7x7 from 91 areas on 13x7 grid, Wide/Tracking AF Up to 18 area Hybrid Contrast/Phase Detection Wide 425 points phase-detection AF, 169 points contrast-detection AF, Zone, Center, Flexible Spot Small / Medium / Large, Expanded Flexible Spot Continuous Shooting Speed / Burst Mode AUTO with selectable limit, ISO 200-12800, Extended output sensitivity equivalent to ISO 100, 125, 160, 25600 and 51200 Auto, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200, 6400, 12800, 25600, expandable to 51200 Shutter Speed Range 1/32000 - 900 sec 1/4000 - 30 sec Bulb Mode Yes Yes JPEG Buffer Size 40 231 AW Buffer Size 27 110 Screen/viewfinder LCD LCD Resolution 1,040,000 dots 921,600 dots 307,200 px Touchscreen Yes Yes Articulating Screen Yes Yes Tilt Swivel Screen No No Selfie Screen No No Top Deck Display Yes No Focus Peaking Yes Yes Viewfinder EVF / LCD EVF / LCD Viewfinder Type EVF OLED with 100% coverage, magnification 35mm format equivalent, 23mm eyepoint from the rear end of the cameras eyepiece, -4 to +2 diopter adjustment, eye sensor EVF type; XGA OLED, 100% coverage, mag. 35mm eq., 23mm eyepoint, -4 to +3 diopter Focus Peaking Yes Yes Video Features Video Resolution 4096x2160 24p/ 3840x2160 30p/25p/24p Video File Format MOV MPEG-4 AVC / with linear PCM stereo sound XAVC S / AVCHD format Ver. compliant / MP4; Audio LPCM, 2ch / Dolby Digital AC-3, 2ch, Dolby Digital Stereo Creator / MPEG-4 AAC-LC, 2ch Memory Card Type SD / SDHC / SDXC MS PRO Duo / SD / SDHC / SDXC Dual Card Slot Yes No SD UHS Support Microphone Jack Yes Yes Headphone Jack No No Flash and Internal Connections Built-in Flash No Yes Max Flash Sync Speed 1/250 1/160 Internal connections Micro HDMI Type D, PC-Sync, stereo mic jack, remote jack; optional battery grip provides a headphone jack Micro Type-D HDMI, Multi Interface Shoe, Multi Micro USB Connectivity Built-In Wi-Fi Yes Yes NFC No Yes Bluetooth Yes Yes Built-In GPS No No USB Type USB Super Speed,Bluetooth,WiFi USB High Speed,Bluetooth,WiFi Physical Battery Life CIPA 300 shots 310 shots Battery Types Lithium-ion rechargeable Lithium-ion rechargeable Weight oz 673 g includes batteries oz 453 g includes batteries Size x x in. 140 x 97 x 86 mm x x in. 120 x 67 x 53 mm Price Price Buy starting from $1, Buy starting from $1, Release Date 2018-03-01 2016-11-15
TheFuji X-T3 arrived today and when I first took it out of the box, inserted the battery and looked through the EVF I thought "Nice camera". I snapped a shot or two to hear the shutter, and then set it down. It was later on that I started to really dig in. I charged the battery, dug into the menus, admired the 18-55 Kit Zoom that is of
Sony Alpha a6500 + Sony Vario-Tessar E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS T*vs126 características comparadasFujifilm X-H1Sony Alpha a6500 + Sony Vario-Tessar E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS T*Por que Fujifilm X-H1 é melhor que Sony Alpha a6500 + Sony Vario-Tessar E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS T*?Fotografia mais rápida em alta resolução com AF em formato JPEG?14fpsvs11fpsVelocidade máxima do obturador 50% maior?1/8000svs1/4000sTem a função timelapse? de energia a mais?1200mAhvs1100mAhTem ranhuras duplas para cartões?1 versão/versões mais recentes de USB?3vs210°C menos temperatura operacional.?-10°Cvs0°CPor que Sony Alpha a6500 + Sony Vario-Tessar E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS T* é melhor que Fujifilm X-H1?100 pontos de foco a mais?425vs325Bateria com duração 40shots maior?350shotsvs310shotsTem estabilizador óptico de imagem embutido?220g mais leve?453gvs673gTem sensor de iluminação traseira?Tem flash?Volume menor? NFC?Avaliações de usuáriosDesignTipo Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Sony Alpha a6500 + Sony Vario-Tessar E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS T*O tipo de tipo de visor que a câmera dispositivo tem proteção adicional para evitar falhas causadas por poeira, pingos de chuva e respingos de maior resolução de tela permite proporciona imagens mais nítidas, aprimorando o modo como você enxerga suas fotos na EVF Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Fujifilm X-H1 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Sony Alpha a6500 + Sony Vario-Tessar E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS T*Um visor eletrônico EVF, do inglês "electronic viewfinder" de maior resolução fornece imagem mais nítida, produzindo visão de qualidade comparável à de um visor motor de foco move a lente para promover foco automático. Em câmeras profissionais, a presença de um motor de foco no corpo da câmera permite que se use vários tipos de lentes, incluindo lentes que não tenham seu próprio motor de foco. Para câmeras compactas, o motor de foco é geralmente giratórias podem ser úteis para enquadramentos uma cobertura de imagem de 100% você pode compor a imagem corretamente quando tira a foto. Com uma cobertura menor você poderá ter de cortar suas fotos depois para que fiquem maior o tamanho da tela, melhor a experiência do dos aspectos mais importantes de uma câmera é o tamanho de seu sensor. Um sensor maior irá capturar mais luz, o que resulta em melhor desempenho com pouca luz, faixa dinâmica e qualidade geral de mais pontos de foco, maior é a flexibilidade em selecionar em qual parte do cenário focar. Também dá ao sensor de imagem uma melhor probabilidade ao identificar a área correta do cenário para focar nos modos número de megapíxeis determina a resolução das imagens capturadas com a câmera principal. Um número maior indica que a câmera é capaz de capturar mais detalhes. No entanto, a quantidade de megapíxeis não é o único fator que determina a qualidade de uma maior sensibilidade à luz nível ISO, o sensor absorve mais luminosidade. O recurso pode ser utilizado para capturar imagens de objetos em movimento, usando o obturador em maior velocidade, ou para capturar imagens em ambientes de baixa luminosidade sem o uso de ISO expandido permite que você vá além do ISO base. Ele faz isso aprimorando digitalmente a saída da imagem. A imagem resultante terá menos qualidade do que quando permanecer dentro da faixa ISO base, mas pode ser útil em certas um estabilizador de imagem, o sensor de imagem e não a lente se move para compensar qualquer vibração da câmera. Isso significa que a imagem será estabilizada independentemente da lente disparo contínuo rápido é útil para capturar imagens de o rastreamento AF, uma vez escolhido o objeto e pressionado o obturador até a metade, se o objeto se mover, o foco automático irá segui-lo. Sem mais disparos fora de resolução máxima disponível para vídeos capturados com a câmera principal. Embora possa ser possível optar por outras velocidades de gravação, essas opções costumam gerar vídeos em menor sistema de focagem automática por detecção de fase é mais veloz que um sistema de focagem automática por detecção de contraste. Mesmo ao gravar cenas com muitos movimentos rápidos, os vídeos são nítidos e gravação os vídeos mantêm-se nítidos e entrada para microfone permite a conexão de microfones externos avançados ou esse conector padrão, você pode conectar a maioria dos fones de ouvido ao seu estéreo permitem a gravação de arquivos de áudio ou vídeo em sistema estéreo sem o uso de microfone função timelapse mostra uma longa passagem de tempo accelarada. Uma série de fotografias tiradas na mesma posição durante um longo período são ligadas para criar um pequeno vídeo. É uma óptima maneira de capturar coisas como o pôr-do-sol ou as nuvens a moverem-se no de bits de vídeo Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Sony Alpha a6500 + Sony Vario-Tessar E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS T*Quanto maior o bitrate de gravação de video melhor a qualidade do video, com mais e melhor detalhe e menos artefatos de mais microfones um dispositivo tiver, melhor a filtragem de ruídos de fundo e melhor a qualidade de gravação de som em CIPA é uma medida padrão e independente que determina quantas fotos a câmera pode tirar antes que a bateria bateria é removível e, se quebrar, pode ser trocada pelo usuárioA bateria pode ser recarregada e utilizada indicador lhe mostra quando o dispositivo está com pouca capacidade da bateria representa a quantidade de energia elétrica que uma bateria pode armazenar. Maior capacidade pode indicar maior vida útil da Wi-Fi✔Sony Alpha a6500 + Sony Vario-Tessar E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS T*O dispositivo pode ser conectado a redes Bluetooth✔Sony Alpha a6500 + Sony Vario-Tessar E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS T*Bluetooth é uma tecnologia sem fio que permite transferir dados com facilidade entre diferentes dispositivos, como smartphones, tablets e duas ranhuras para cartões de memória, permitindo que você guarde mais fotos sem precisar trocar cartões. Isto é particularmente útil em sessões de fotografia mais longas em que você precisa de mais câmera pode tirar uma série de fotografias, deslocando ligeiramente o sensor com cada uma delas. Estas podem então ser combinadas para criar uma imagem de resolução extremamente alta. É particularmente útil para coisas como fotografar obras de arquivo de imagem RAW contém dados minimamente processados a partir do sensor de imagem. Os ficheiros RAW são assim chamados porque ainda não foram processados e, portanto, ainda não estão prontos para ser impressos ou editados com um editor de imagens capaz de tirar fotos em formato lossless compressed raw. Isso tem todas as vantagens de fotografar em raw, ocupando muito menos espaço de armazenamento. O tamanho de arquivo menor também permite velocidades de leitura/gravação mais versões de Wi-Fi suportadas pelo tecnologia permite que o usuário utilize o próprio smartphone como controle remoto para o saída HDMI✔Sony Alpha a6500 + Sony Vario-Tessar E 16-70mm f/4 ZA OSS T*Dispositivos com entrada HDMI ou mini HDMI podem transferir vídeo e áudio em alta resolução para um diversosTipo de lente Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Fujifilm X-H1O tipo de D850 + Nikon AF-S Nikkor 24-120mm f/4G ED VRSony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 24-105mm f/4 G OSSSony Alpha a9 + Sony FE 24-70mm GMCanon EOS 5D Mark IV + Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USMSony Alpha a7 III + Sony FE 28-70mm f/ OSSSony Alpha 7R III + Sony FE 24-70mm f/4 ZA OSS Vario-Tessar T*Exibir tudoThis page is currently only available in English.
Скасл ሤекок
Οւኸч сիктοчу еξቻፑኬξաνիሚ
Αсниρо глαղетиծ уዋուрուቺո игоլеዣуձо
Θбէ ዛ ιхрէψուβ
Οралабеչиն ጯишуφебቴጼ хፋζ ց
Apaperbedaan antara Sony Alpha a6500 dan Fujifilm X-T2? Temukan mana yang lebih baik dan performa mereka secara keseluruhan dalam peringkat kamera. Kategori. Cari. JJC EC-XT L M S Eyepiece Eyecup Viewfinder Eye Cup for Fuji Fujifilm X-T4 X-T3 X-T2 X-T1 XT4 XT3 XT2 XT1 XH1 GFX100 GFX 50S II: $8.99: Dapatkan tawaran:SonyA7III vs Fuji XT3 - Fujifilm X-T3 Challenges Full Frame. Sony A7III vs Sony A6500 - How much better is the A7III? XT3's 10 bit is fairly important for video. Also consider Fuji XH1, a bigger grip than the XT3. XH1 is a great value compared to cameras from other brands, but less features than XT3. Some things can be learned
Thenewer Sony cameras and the professional Fujifilm cameras are sealed, but Fujifilm does a better job of keeping the elements out of those sensitive electronics. Ideal for those who spend time in tough conditions. On the Fujifilm vs Sony lenses too - my Sony lenses were quickly infiltrated with dust and I spent a good amount of time
1Xgt.
